Talk:Coup de Chance
Add topic| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| On 12 May 2026, it was proposed that this article be moved from Coup de chance to Coup de Chance. The result of the discussion was moved. |
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:38, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
Requested move 12 May 2026
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 16:06, 19 May 2026 (UTC)
Coup de chance → Coup de Chance – This entry was created in February 2023 as Coup de Chance. In June, its main title header was unilaterally moved to Coup de chance and, in September, it was moved back to Coup de Chance on the basis of the poster and then moved again to Coup de chance. Indeed, the French-language poster appended to the entry's infobox does use an uppercase "C". Also, among the 25 inline cites under Coup de chance#References, nearly all use "Chance", rather than "chance". Thus, it would appear that, in the English-speaking world, this film's generally accepted title is Coup de Chance. — Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 18:16, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
- Strong support. I just checked several sources. Almost all of them use "Chance", not "chance". AlloCiné is the only exception among the sources I checked. (I also fixed several lowercase spellings in the text.) — Chrisahn (talk) 18:42, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
- Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:41, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose. MOS:FRENCHCAPS is clear on this. RS prevalence does not trump our Manual of Style. Nardog (talk) 12:49, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
- The RS link is an essay, an opinion editorial, not a guideline. Sources are overwhelmingly uppercased for this film. Randy Kryn (talk) 13:41, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
- I don't think MOS:FRENCHCAPS should override MOS:FOREIGNTITLE and – more importantly – WP:COMMONNAME in this case. The film was written, directed and produced by Allen and other Americans. They chose the usual American capitalization for the title. Almost all sources use the uppercase "Chance". — Chrisahn (talk) 14:02, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
- Support per nom, overwhelming use of uppercase in sources as well as in promotional material. Thanks for the nomination, I wasn't aware of this Woody Allen film. Randy Kryn (talk) 13:40, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

