Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:CoryxKenshin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Top of the page looks messed up and mentions that he's dead due to cancer???

[edit]

The top section of the article looks messy (The section in a red box). Aside from that, the article mentions that he has died March 25, 2024 due to cancer (underlined in green), which is, as far as I'm aware, false. Obviously someone was just trolling and edited it like that.

https://ibb.co/bXNnFcF Idiroon (talk) 15:41, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Idiroon Removed this info. Also, you're welcome to revert this info yourself; always feel free to remove damaging info when you have the chance. PantheonRadiance (talk) 19:55, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Could we add a picture of Williams?

[edit]

Other YouTubers have their pictures on their pages except him. Uggupuggu (talk) 06:53, 22 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

That would be great! Since it's an article about a living person, we would need a freely licensed image. If someone would like to try and get in touch with him or his team about submitting an image, Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission has tips on how to do that. hinnk (talk) 06:39, 8 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Wait quick question, you mentioned "living person", so is there a difference when putting images of those who are deceased? Uggupuggu (talk) 15:45, 10 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 14 July 2025

[edit]

In the filmography section, please remove the false appearances in "Super Hornio Brothers" and "Porn" in the Nickelodeon channel. These are obviously fake. Username.zip (talk) 18:25, 14 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

 Done Dahawk04 Talk 💬 20:00, 14 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Should we have a "controversies" section now that Cory is in hot water?

[edit]

So supposedly, CoryxKenshin is in hot water for supposedly "emotionally manipulating" this girl on tiktok, listening to her problems and then ghosting here... So should we add this or not? 2606:9400:98A0:92A0:14A6:DACA:B530:1DCC (talk) 20:55, 14 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

there are good enough sources for it, i vote yes 185.98.171.185 (talk) 03:46, 15 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
it was debunked in less then a day with the girl admitting she lied and people who knew her stating the "realationship" never even exsisted in the first place 2603:7080:393C:353:D9B3:9445:3B7A:4401 (talk) 21:11, 16 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
but it still should be added 2606:9400:98A0:92A0:D4EF:F364:64CF:E0BD (talk) 22:22, 16 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
no it shouldn't 2603:7080:393C:353:FE27:84AF:F046:B65A (talk) 04:00, 17 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
I concur with adding a controversies section, provided that all sources are true. Uggupuggu (talk) 08:23, 7 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Theres absolutely no reason to give it any attention it was almost immediately disproved and the accuser herself admitted she lied we shouldnt be adding a controversy section for an accusation that was never taken seriously (the only sources that cover it are tabloids from india and Pakistan) Steven547 (talk) 14:49, 8 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Aight makes sense, but also I'm new to wikipedia so I have this question: Are youtube videos allowed to be taken as sources ever? cuz there are a few videos discussing the situation in detail. Uggupuggu (talk) 15:43, 10 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Also cory has had many controversies in the past other than this one which is why I was inclined to agree Uggupuggu (talk) 15:44, 10 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
The first one was some vauge accusation thst took a tiktok out of context and wasnt covered in any sources, the only controversy is the fact that people are eveh considering adding laughably horrible attempts to cancel someone that has no relablie sources other then Indian tabloids. Plus both accusations were proven to be false so why would we add a controversy section for a controversy that wasnt real Steven547 (talk) 15:47, 10 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:21, 11 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Requested grammar fix

[edit]

"the horror game, The Mortuary Assistant": that comma is wrong and should be removed. 2A00:23C5:FE1C:3701:653D:157E:F1E0:332C (talk) 18:14, 11 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:07, 9 December 2025 (UTC)Reply