Talk:CoryxKenshin
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the CoryxKenshin article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find video game sources: "CoryxKenshin" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
The following are reference ideas for CoryxKenshin. Click [show] for details. The following reference(s) may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
| This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Top of the page looks messed up and mentions that he's dead due to cancer???
[edit]The top section of the article looks messy (The section in a red box). Aside from that, the article mentions that he has died March 25, 2024 due to cancer (underlined in green), which is, as far as I'm aware, false. Obviously someone was just trolling and edited it like that.
https://ibb.co/bXNnFcF Idiroon (talk) 15:41, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Idiroon Removed this info. Also, you're welcome to revert this info yourself; always feel free to remove damaging info when you have the chance. PantheonRadiance (talk) 19:55, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Could we add a picture of Williams?
[edit]Other YouTubers have their pictures on their pages except him. Uggupuggu (talk) 06:53, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- That would be great! Since it's an article about a living person, we would need a freely licensed image. If someone would like to try and get in touch with him or his team about submitting an image, Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission has tips on how to do that. hinnk (talk) 06:39, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- Wait quick question, you mentioned "living person", so is there a difference when putting images of those who are deceased? Uggupuggu (talk) 15:45, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 14 July 2025
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the filmography section, please remove the false appearances in "Super Hornio Brothers" and "Porn" in the Nickelodeon channel. These are obviously fake. Username.zip (talk) 18:25, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Should we have a "controversies" section now that Cory is in hot water?
[edit]So supposedly, CoryxKenshin is in hot water for supposedly "emotionally manipulating" this girl on tiktok, listening to her problems and then ghosting here... So should we add this or not? 2606:9400:98A0:92A0:14A6:DACA:B530:1DCC (talk) 20:55, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
- there are good enough sources for it, i vote yes 185.98.171.185 (talk) 03:46, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
- it was debunked in less then a day with the girl admitting she lied and people who knew her stating the "realationship" never even exsisted in the first place 2603:7080:393C:353:D9B3:9445:3B7A:4401 (talk) 21:11, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- but it still should be added 2606:9400:98A0:92A0:D4EF:F364:64CF:E0BD (talk) 22:22, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- no it shouldn't 2603:7080:393C:353:FE27:84AF:F046:B65A (talk) 04:00, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
- but it still should be added 2606:9400:98A0:92A0:D4EF:F364:64CF:E0BD (talk) 22:22, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- I concur with adding a controversies section, provided that all sources are true. Uggupuggu (talk) 08:23, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- Theres absolutely no reason to give it any attention it was almost immediately disproved and the accuser herself admitted she lied we shouldnt be adding a controversy section for an accusation that was never taken seriously (the only sources that cover it are tabloids from india and Pakistan) Steven547 (talk) 14:49, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
- Aight makes sense, but also I'm new to wikipedia so I have this question: Are youtube videos allowed to be taken as sources ever? cuz there are a few videos discussing the situation in detail. Uggupuggu (talk) 15:43, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- Also cory has had many controversies in the past other than this one which is why I was inclined to agree Uggupuggu (talk) 15:44, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- The first one was some vauge accusation thst took a tiktok out of context and wasnt covered in any sources, the only controversy is the fact that people are eveh considering adding laughably horrible attempts to cancel someone that has no relablie sources other then Indian tabloids. Plus both accusations were proven to be false so why would we add a controversy section for a controversy that wasnt real Steven547 (talk) 15:47, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- Theres absolutely no reason to give it any attention it was almost immediately disproved and the accuser herself admitted she lied we shouldnt be adding a controversy section for an accusation that was never taken seriously (the only sources that cover it are tabloids from india and Pakistan) Steven547 (talk) 14:49, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:21, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Requested grammar fix
[edit]"the horror game, The Mortuary Assistant": that comma is wrong and should be removed. 2A00:23C5:FE1C:3701:653D:157E:F1E0:332C (talk) 18:14, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:07, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/30 August 2022
- Accepted AfC submissions
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Low-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class horror articles
- Low-importance horror articles
- WikiProject Horror articles
- Start-Class Internet culture articles
- Low-importance Internet culture articles
- WikiProject Internet culture articles
- Start-Class YouTube articles
- Mid-importance YouTube articles
- WikiProject YouTube articles
- Start-Class video game articles
- Low-importance video game articles
- WikiProject Video games articles
- Wikipedia articles that use American English


