Talk:Compulsory trade
Add topicLatest comment: 8 years ago by Klbrain in topic Proposed merge with Voluntary trades
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | The content of Voluntary trades was merged into Compulsory trade on 24 March 2018. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Proposed merge with Voluntary trades
[edit]Each term only makes sense when contrasted to the other; the article on voluntary trades has more information about compulsory trades than about voluntary trades. PamD 21:36, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support I agree -- the term compulsory trades makes for at least the beginnings of a stub article. The term voluntary trades could essentially be boiled down to "everything else". WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:15, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support for both reasons above. Little Will (talk) 17:15, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support, I don't see a need to separate the subjects into two articles. PKT(alk) 16:39, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
