Talk:Comp Air

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Certificated

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I believe the correct word is certificated, i.e. a type certificate was issued, when referring to the FAA signing off on a commercial aircraft design.Es330td (talk) 21:39, 13 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Americans say "certificated" whereas most other English-speaking countries say "certified". - Ahunt (talk) 22:08, 13 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Certificated