Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports
Assess: newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Water sports, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Water sportsWikipedia:WikiProject Water sportsTemplate:WikiProject Water sportsWater sports
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Swimming, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.SwimmingWikipedia:WikiProject SwimmingTemplate:WikiProject SwimmingSwimming
Cole Classic is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I've removed the Controversy section from the article. The section read like the organisers defending themselves from online criticism, which doesn't belong on an encyclopaedia, and between the references in the section I could only find mentions of criticism at all on Blogspot, which is not a reliable source. As far as I can tell, there aren't better references/news coverage about the controversies, so it seems like they don't belong in the article. – Insincere Giraffe (talk) 17:35, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=logo}
