Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Clonazepam

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Citation for elimination half life in infobox is irrelevant

[edit]

Reading through citation 9 (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1600-0404.2008.01004.x) which is the citation given for the elimination half life in the infobar. The paper doesn't actually discuss the elimination half-life of clonazepam in detail nor gives a specific number for it. The paper is on treating epilepsy with benzodiazepines, specifically.


It briefly mentions that some benzodiazepines have long half-lives due to lipid solubility. But, that's the most relevant it gets.


I checked and double checked the entirety of the full paper just to be sure I'm not mistaken. Not just the abstract, the full article. I could find no specific mention or a figure of 19 to 60 hours for the elimination half-life of clonazepam anywhere within the paper.


As such, I am removing this as a citation for the elimination half-life of clonazepam.


I am also suggesting that a relevant citation be used, and the figure of 19 to 60 hours listed as the elimination be reviewed and changed according to the new citation, relevant citation.


I also think the current figure of 19 to 60 hours should be removed immediately as it has no credible citation. Medical articles have a higher standard for claims and the citations that support them. As such, I think a more aggressive approach is necessary than if it were about another topic. But, I will leave this up to a community discussion. VoidHalo (talk) 21:28, 21 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

It doesn't discuss but it includes the value in table 2 citing Berlin A, Dahlström H. Pharmacokinetics of the anticonvulsant drug clonazepam evaluated from single oral and intravenous doses and by repeated oral administration. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1975; 9: 155–9. Traumnovelle (talk) 23:04, 21 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
ahh thank you for pointing that out. Though, I said I would remove the citation for this figure, I never did. Deciding, instead, to leave it to community discussion.
As usual, I'm glad I decided to err on the side of caution. I had a nagging feeling there was something I was missing.
Thank you, good sir. VoidHalo (talk) 23:22, 21 April 2026 (UTC)Reply