Talk:Climate Council
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Femkemilene in topic NPOV
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NPOV
[edit]This article, especially the "Projects and purpose" section, uses sensational and unencyclopedic wording such "capturing the public's imagination", "groundbreaking research" "courageous catalyst", "climate crisis", "authoritative and expert", "hold Australia's leaders to account" and "landmark report" in ways that bias the article towards the subject and give undue weight to the subjects point of view. Furthermore, the article portrays the subject in an entirely positive way, and does not include any negative commentary on the subject. 053pvr (talk) 06:49, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Fair enough comment. I'll take a look Gumsaint (talk) 03:05, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- Cut a lot out. Article still relies too much on primary sourcing. FemkeMilene (talk) 18:40, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
- Fair enough comment. I'll take a look Gumsaint (talk) 03:05, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class organization articles
- Unknown-importance organization articles
- WikiProject Organizations articles
- C-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- C-Class Environment articles
- Unknown-importance Environment articles
- C-Class Climate change articles
- Mid-importance Climate change articles
- WikiProject Climate change articles

