Talk:Civil Operations and Rural Development Support

Military history: Asian / North America / Southeast Asia / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	North American military history task force
	Southeast Asian military history task force
	United States military history task force

Vietnam High‑importance

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Low importance?

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

In the words of William Colby, pacification under CORDS was General Abrams's "number one strategy for the war." CORDS, to quote the Time Life history, "may have been the greatest success of America's two-decade-long involvement in Vietnam." And this article is of low importance? Smallchief (talk 13:25, 18 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

No argument being made to the contrary I have changed this article from "low" to "high" importance. Smallchief (talk 10:07, 24 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Name?

Latest comment: 4 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Why is the name of the article different from the definition of the acronym given in the first paragraph? ~2026-13231-84 (talk) 08:08, 1 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

My guess is it was either vandalism or someone making a very stupid mistake. Anyway, I fixed the title. Arrowgrab (talk) 14:00, 5 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Low importance?

Name?