Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Chrystos

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 years ago by SMcCandlish in topic They/them
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chrystos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:17, 24 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

POV

[edit]

written mostly from their point of view. NPOV is required, but for someone as uniquely transgressive of colonizer NPOV norms as chrystos, a gentle hand is needed to rewrite with both respect to WP, and respect to them. I would like to try, and will do so when i have time. i qualify as a seasoned WP editor, and as someone whose empathic response to nonbinary and noncolonizer identities, and writing from those places, is a general shaking of the body and tears. so yeah, i can try.(mercurywoodrose)50.193.19.66 (talk) 19:43, 24 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Potential Sources

[edit]

Here are some potential resources which might be useful for editors interested in improving this article:

Aquilessa (talk) 16:12, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

They/them

[edit]

This article should be rewritten some, to use they/them. The current text mostly dates to before MoS countenanced that, and it just repeats the subject's mononym over and over again, which is clumsy and tedious, though was perhaps a reasonable option before singular-they/them became better-accepted.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  19:20, 14 August 2023 (UTC)Reply