Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Chrysocolla

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Tillman in topic Formula bogus? x < 1? Expert needed...

Disputed status as mineral species

[edit]

Thanks for the notes about that -- not something I was aware of. I recall from when I worked in Miami, AZ the 'gemmy chrysocolla' from Inspiration (Live Oak??) was chrys coated with a thin "skin' of clear chalcedony -- so it didn't crumble, dehydrate & didintegrate as most older chrys samples do, sigh. Interesting --Pete Tillman (talk) 17:52, 20 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Formula bogus? x < 1? Expert needed...

[edit]

The formula given is weird. It uses 2-x in two places (usually the larger expression appears once) and places an upper bound of x at 0.999. I'm pretty sure that's not right, but an expert should check

Riventree (talk) 00:46, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Chrys is a bit of a garbage-can mineral: see note above. Formula is "correct" as a best guess. Might be more of a mineraloid. Pete Tillman (talk) 03:57, 8 June 2025 (UTC)Reply