Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Chrysanthemum stone

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 months ago by CaioDollis in topic Very weird

There may be some confusion

[edit]

The "flower stone" found on Vancouver Island is described here as "gabbro porphyry of feldspar crystals usually in basalt". Feldspar is also an aluminum silicate (andalusite). The linked article says it is similar to "Chinese Writing Rock", which is also feldspar crystals in basalt. It is found in California and Nevada. In other words, there are three similar interesting stones (that I know of), but the current article says, "[c]hysanthemum stone from Liuyang City, Hunan Province is mainly calcite and chalcedony (quartz)..." which is not the same thing, contradicting the previous statement that it is andalusite.

In addition, the current article has some quirky English "The intact chrysanthemum stone from the naturally exposed environment has become extinct...", " and "it is the ideal collection of stone lovers" and seems very Chinese-oriented. It is not necessary to repeat that the stone is not radioactive and harmless. Similar stones are found in several places. This article needs the assistance of a geologist and perhaps should be moved to a different, more generic name. Wastrel Way (talk) 19:36, 30 June 2024 (UTC)EricReply

Very weird

[edit]

This article looks like some direct translation of some other source with very little grasp of what's being said.

"Doesn't contain radioactive elements" — it absolutely does, as it's expected from every natural rock.

"beneficial elements" — beneficial to whom?? To those who eat the rock as nutritional supplement? This is the kind of article that needs to rewritten from blank, because the present text is almost pure nonsense CaioDollis (talk) 02:49, 20 February 2026 (UTC)Reply