Talk:Chisel
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chisel article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This  level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
V-shaped chisels
[edit]You guys should not forget about the V-shaped chisels (German name: Geißfuß, "she-goat's foot") used in linocut, for example. -andy 78.51.73.91 (talk) 14:50, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Needs rewording
[edit]Japanese Woodworking Chisels reads like an advert, and adds little if anything to the discussion of chisels. Also, Lathe Tools should not be a subheading. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.11.4.28 (talk) 01:20, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Redirection to German wiki
[edit]I came across a slight problem. This page is redirected to "Meißel". Which is a minor part in the article. The English has one word only for German: "Meißel" and "Beitel". The latter being used for woodwork only. Atm the German wiki does not reflect the English version for "Beitel". And I have even thought about the idea for having a joint article and realized a that for the German language that would not be possible. Both idioms are just used even to differ the specific usage. Any ideas? Oldnag85 (talk) 19:55, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
- de:Meißel is correct for Chisel. Wood chisel would link to de:Beitel, if we develop an article on those specifically. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:19, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
- Sounds like a very constructive idea. Let us just wait if other ideas show up. If not I believe we should go that way. Oldnag85 (talk) 21:37, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Chisel history
[edit]In the History section, it'd be really helpful to see when different kinds of chisels become 'common in the archeological record.' Otherwise, the section has little value.Twang (talk) 23:48, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
I added history about the material changes and how chisels were used throughout the stone, bronze and iron ages. I felt this was necessary because there was very little history before. I believe my additions add valuable knowledge about the material changes through time. User:AdamSwcu