Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Years since the description of Chilesaurus, is the animal still considered a taxonomic anomaly? The way it's treated here is inconsistent; the category suggests theropod but the template suggests ornithischian. This needs fixing. Should we aim to be taxonomically neutral? Zigongosaurus1138 (talk) 19:11, 26 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
