Talk:Charodeika-class monitor

Charodeika-class monitor has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 4, 2014. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Charodeika-class monitor appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 December 2013. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the contracts for the two Charodeika-class monitors were transferred to their designer, Charles Mitchell, upon the death of their builder, S. G. Kudriavtsev, in August 1865?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Did you know archive/2013/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Charodeika-class monitor.

Wikipedia

Military history: Maritime / Russian & Soviet

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Russia: Technology & engineering / Military Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force.

GA Review

Latest comment: 12 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Charodeika-class monitor/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tomobe03 (talk · contribs) 12:22, 17 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

I'll review this article shortly.--Tomobe03 (talk) 12:22, 17 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

No disambiguation links found (no action required)
Checklinks reports no problems with external links (no action required)
There are four duplicate links in the article which should be removed per WP:OVERLINK. Those are: boiler, smoothbore, waterline and freeboard.
Image sourcing/licence/caption seem to be in order. The presently found templates at the commons indicate US-PD tag is required. Maybe it would be a good idea to add one.
Prose referencing appears to be in order (no action required)
Please add ISSN (or OCLC) for Warship International. According to this, ISSN is 0043-0374.
Where does the 762,000 rouble pricetag specified in the infobox come from? I found no mention of the cost in the prose.
Prose indicates 13+171=184 officers and crew in design/description, 177 in sinking of Rusalka, while the infobox states 172. Should there be some modifications to the infobox or it pertains to a specific period/configuration?
- Crew size always fluctuates as equipment is added or removed; I'm just using what my main source gave me for crew numbers.
  - Of course, but the figure stated in the infobox does not appear in the prose where it could be referenced - at least I can't find it there.--Tomobe03 (talk) 11:29, 30 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
    - Ah, I'd missed your comment earlier. Fixed.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 11:47, 4 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

I apologize for taking this long to review the article - a RL project quickly piled. Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk) 12:24, 29 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

No trouble, thanks for reviewing it.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:11, 30 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

All clear now. Good work!--Tomobe03 (talk) 12:02, 4 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

GA Review