Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Challenger bank

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 months ago by Hex in topic Merger proposal

Merge

[edit]

Aren't all (most?) of these banks direct banks? It sounds like a new buzzword for the same thing an older buzzword refers to. ajf (talk) 17:40, 8 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

All these challenger banks may be direct banks but not all direct banks are challenger banks. This is a UK-specific topic, the articles should not be merged. I'm removing your merge tag on that basis.  Hex talk 10:46, 9 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
I'm replacing with Template:Globalize/UK then. I'm unconvinced challenger banks are a UK-specific phenomenon. ajf (talk) 11:02, 9 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
That's a fair point. I understand the current article title to be UK-derived but there may be other international names, and certainly "upstart" banks must be appearing in other places.  Hex talk 12:18, 9 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

This should be merged with Neobanks - the page as it is currently written is purely from a UK perspective and Challenger Banks/Neo Banks is quite clearly a global phenomenon - and many markets have a far higher impact of such "banks" e.g. China, Brazil, Germany etc. than the UK. Only Monzo in the UK has made even a half hearted attempt at international expansion whereas Revolut/N26 have shown remarkably internationalisation.  Preceding unsigned comment added by Bankaza (talkcontribs) 22:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposal

[edit]

I propose to merge Challenger Banks into Neobanks. I think that the content in the Challenger Bank article can easily be explained in the context of Neobanks, and the Neobank article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Challenger Bank will not cause any problems as far as article size is concerned. Bankaza (talk) 00:56, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

You'd need to start with providing a reliable source that clearly states that they are the same thing. - MrOllie (talk) 01:52, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
(5 years late reply!) I'd oppose such a merge similarly to the proposal above to merge this into direct bank, because it's not an exact match. Neobanks are online-only, but challenger banks can be physical, for example Metro Bank. It does seem like there's sufficient overlap for a new article containing all three, but I don't know what you would call it. "21st century banks" comes to mind but that's just something I made up on the spot.  Hex talk 11:57, 23 January 2026 (UTC)Reply