Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Challenger Deep

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 months ago by Billsmith60 in topic C-class to B-class

What is a sample?

[edit]

No link to what they are or how they’re made. 2600:1700:6756:4830:9DFB:D817:1B88:C1CD (talk) 23:39, 10 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

The samples taken were depth soundings. All the information was there in the paragraph about the 1875 Challenger expedition, but it was presented in a slightly confusing order. I have tweaked this to make things a bit more clear. Does that help? Pyrope 02:50, 11 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Explaining bomb/explosive soundings

[edit]

There are a lot of mentions here of bomb soundings or explosive soundings, which are not explained in the article. I would like to link these to another appropriate article, but I don't know what the right target would be. The articles on echo sounding, depth sounding, and multibeam echosounder don't seem to cover this. One thing I found was Sofar bomb but it doesn't seem like the right topic. Can anyone help to find the right article, or do we have a gap here? Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 03:27, 24 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

How deep?

[edit]

I've started a discussion at Talk:Mariana Trench about the inconsistency between the values used in the two articles. Mikenorton (talk) 12:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

What is it?

[edit]

The article needs a section at the start saying what it is and how it formed. I find it most odd that there isn't a section about the geological processes that formed it. Just endless willy-waggling accounts of the various expeditions. 86.189.141.23 (talk) 19:53, 11 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

C-class to B-class

[edit]

This article has been extremely well referenced for a C-class article, and although it meets several other standards of a B-class article (Wikipedia:Content assessment/B-Class criteria), I wonder if it could benefit from an info box or two, and some broadening of language for a less technically savvy audience. I think with those two issues addressed, it could be reclassified. What do others think? LesserGoldfinch (talk) 21:17, 30 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

I agree Ben Halfond (talk) 14:13, 27 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
The level of detail is excessive and would preclude the article being regraded to "B" Billsmith60 (talk) 21:33, 18 March 2026 (UTC)Reply