Talk:Chakavian
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chakavian article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2 |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Bias creates problems in an encyclopedic forum
[edit]@Miki Filigranski: in response to your following reply:
- It is dubious whether it improved the article, as obviously a lot of text was moved without taking care of the references and context. Today will re-check and edit accordingly.--Miki Filigranski (talk) 17:27, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
This whole article is a mess, as well as most of the wiki articles on topics with contact points between Croats and Serbs.
Instead of a balanced inclusion of texts from credible sources, there are constant wars between editors who are obsessed with these topics and use Wikipedia as a platform for their expression.
Therefore, no stage of this article can be considered better than another. More credible are those rare moments when a third-party editor gets involved, like VasyaPetrovna, but here we have just witnessed how the same editors quickly cancel such innovations, acting as if they were the owners of the articles.
These topics chronically maintain their own negative image – the impression of an intolerant Balkan in reality is the same on Wikipedia (WP:CT/EE) – and thus do not arouse the interest of other editors and researchers. Dalida Editor please ping or message me 21:04, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I don't understand what you want to say in this section. Saying that the whole article is a mess, and that no revision is better than the other, contradicts the editing policy and understanding of the topic. Article in current revision is fine, also, WP:BRD is not WP:OWN. I will make a partial revert, but some claims need a direct reference and else.--Miki Filigranski (talk) 17:42, 12 December 2025 (UTC)
- The lack of self criticism is incredible and you completely missed my point. Just keep having fun, you and everyone else. Dalida Editor please ping or message me 01:56, 13 December 2025 (UTC)