Talk:Certified chronometer
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Certified chronometer redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | The content of the Certified chronometer page was merged into Chronometer watch on 12 September 2017, and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article, please see its history. |
Merge or rewrite
[edit]This article (Certified chronometer) and Chronometer watch are largely duplications. It seems to me that the material about COSC certification should be in an article with a title like COSC certified chronometer because other groups have certified chronometers over history. It also appears to me that the articles should recognize that the word "chronometer", while it has a specific meaning when applied to Swiss watches, in general means a device for accurately measuring time. There are a number of such devices listed at Chronometer (disambiguation). I am hopeful that an editor with an interest in this area might work on this issue. I will post a request at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Time#COSC certified chronometer. I'd be happy to help. Thank you. SchreiberBike (talk) 18:21, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
Criteria
[edit]Is "displaying the seconds" sufficient? Is the stopwatch function unnecessary? As far as I understood, a Chronometer is always a Chronograph, and the article Chronograph defines this as a watch with a stopwatch complication. --BjKa (talk) 19:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)