Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
Ceriantipatharia is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marine life, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Marine lifeWikipedia:WikiProject Marine lifeTemplate:WikiProject Marine lifeMarine life
Latest comment: 11 months ago4 comments3 people in discussion
The new additions to the article, while well-researched, appear to be counter-productive to some extent, as the article currently reads as two long lists of works accepting or not accepting Ceriantipatharia. While these works are helpful to have, it could be better to rely on sources focused on anthozoan phylogeny (favoring secondary sources like meta-analyses and systematic reviews if possible) to summarize the debate in an encyclopedic way, instead of listing every individual mention/lack thereof and artificially dividing the discussion in two. Pinging @Temporatemporus and @UtherSRG for feedback – would you two be okay with reverting to the earlier version for now, and splitting the proposed addition into a temporary draft so that it can be condensed and rewritten in an encyclopedic way before being added back? Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 12:36, 19 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Whilst seeing the expanded version as far from ideal or complete, it's pretty harsh to say that it's counter-productive. It is, if anything, something too primary and lacking in secondary analysis. But is that really worse than the vacuum there beforehand? Reverting the lot repeatedly with no more comment than "Rv - last best" is certainly unacceptable behaviour. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:58, 21 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
