Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Centric relation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Mtj2109

As I am sure you know, the definition of Centric Relation as regards a verifiable and repeatable condylar position within the glenoid fossa has been a source of some considerable debate. I am curious as to how you regard the definition of Centric Relation as presented by Dr. Peter Dawson in his works, including his latest Functional Occlusion: From TMJ to Smile Design eliminating the term "posterior". I am relatively new to the study of occlusion, and I am interested in thoughts regarding Dr. Dawson, the Las Vegas Institute, and others with whom I am not yet familiar. Thank you.

Centric relation is no longer considered as the position of the condyle in the most posterior-superior postion in the glenoid fossa. This was the definition of CR before 1987 but since has been updated. The current Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms defines CR as " a maxillomandibular relationship in which the condyles articulate with the thinnest avascular portion of their respective disks with the complex in the anterior-superior position against the slopes of the articular eminences." Mtj2109 (talk) 17:40, 18 June 2011 (UTC)Reply