Talk:Cedrus

Cedrus has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 9, 2025. (Reviewed version).

Forestry Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Forestry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the profession and science of forestry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ForestryWikipedia:WikiProject ForestryTemplate:WikiProject ForestryForestry
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Plants Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lebanon Mid‑importance

	Lebanon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lebanon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lebanon-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LebanonWikipedia:WikiProject LebanonTemplate:WikiProject LebanonLebanon
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

GA review

Latest comment: 9 months ago7 comments2 people in discussion

Passed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:00, 9 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cedrus/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 13:09, 26 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Bgsu98 (talk · contribs) 22:59, 7 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Whoa, whoa, whoa... how did I miss one of your evergreens? 😉 Bgsu98 (Talk) 22:59, 7 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Comments (10/9/25)

In the lead, I would use an adverb in this sentence: "cedar chests were used by..." Perhaps "often"?
- Added.

In External phylogeny, I would remove the "the" from "structure to the firs".
- Done.

User:Chiswick Chap: This article is very well written, as you can see by the small number of comments I have. Please let me know when you have a chance to go through these, and I will do the source and image reviews as soon as I can. Let me know if you have any questions! Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:54, 9 October 2025 (UTC) Bgsu98: all done to date! Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Image review (10/9/25)

Images have appropriate licenses and captions. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:56, 9 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Source review (10/9/25)

Random spot check of references checks out. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This page was redesigned at the edge.

GA review

Comments (10/9/25)

Image review (10/9/25)

Source review (10/9/25)