Talk:Caudron Simoun

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Requested move

Latest comment: 19 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Simoun (aircraft) → Caudron Simoun – Include manufacturer name in accordance with naming conventions SimonB NZ 09:57, 22 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Done. —Nightst a llion (?) ^{Seen this already?} 06:59, 27 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Discussion

Simoun disambiguation page will also need to change. It's not clear whether this page really refers to a family of aircraft (the Caudron Simoun in all its listed variants) or one particular variant (the C.630, since that is what the stub is mostly about). If the latter, Caudron C.630 Simoun might be a better choice of name.

I am not sure every Simoun subvariant is worthy of its own article, since they are so similar, and all others than the C.635 were built in small or insignificant numbers.PpPachy 22:20, 21 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Requested move

Discussion