Talk:Cardinal gem

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cardinal gem article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Rocks and minerals Low‑importance

	Earth sciences portal Cardinal gem is part of WikiProject Rocks and minerals, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use rocks and minerals resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Rocks and mineralsWikipedia:WikiProject Rocks and mineralsTemplate:WikiProject Rocks and mineralsRocks and minerals
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History of the term

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've done a bit of digging on the history of the term, but the most I can find so far is this trademark application for the term "cardinal gem". That's too close to WP:OR for my liking though. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 16:52, 3 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

History of the term