Talk:Capulin Volcano National Monument

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Capulin Volcano National Monument. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110719072202/http://www.sangres.com/nationalparks/capulin/ to http://www.sangres.com/nationalparks/capulin/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:08, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Possible AI generated text

Hi -- I added the AI generated template in response to this diff. (I Googled the text, it does not seem to be quoting the source given or any other source.) Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:12, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. Track your hook after promotion. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected, closed by Dclemens1971 (talk) 09:33, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that a volcano is named after the Spanish word for Chokecherry?

• Source: "Volcanic Resources Summary—Capulin Volcano National Monument": https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/volcanic-resources-summary-capulin-volcano-national-monument.htm

• • Reviewed: [[]]
  • Comment: To say the article was newly created is far-fetched enough, it's more than 2 decades old. 5x expanded? Not exactly but removing those texts by AI and adding reliable sources seemed to fit? Hope so

5x expanded by H-2-O (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

PeepeeDino (talk) 10:25, 5 May 2026 (UTC).

• Yeah, not going to fly, sorry @PeepeeDino and A person of sorts:. This is a 3.1x reduction. Per WP:5X, "This calculation is made from the last version of the article before the expansion began, even if text from the original was deleted in the process (unless the text was a copyright violation, in which case it does not count towards the size of the original). We don't have enough time and volunteers to reach consensus on the quality of each previous article." If you can reference the Geologic Features section (which probably shouldn't have its own heading) I'd nominate for GA, which will make this eligible again. (Also, not sure why @H-2-O: is being credited when he doesn't seem to have had anything to do with this.)--Launchballer 14:01, 6 May 2026 (UTC)