Talk:Camp Ripley
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 6 months ago by Widgetkid in topic Cemetery Infobox
| The content of Green Prairie Cemetery - Camp Ripley was merged into Camp Ripley on February 2026. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
| Green Prairie Cemetery - Camp Ripley was merged into this article. The discussion was closed on 3 February 2026 with a consensus to merge. The original page is now a redirect to this article. Its history now serves to provide attribution for the content in this article, and it must not be deleted as long as this article exists. |
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
History
[edit]Link for history of Fort Ripley: , p. 40. Other information can be found in Gilman, Rhoda R. (1979). The Red River Trails: Oxcart Routes Between St. Paul and the Selkirk Settlement, 1820-1870. St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society Press. ISBN 0-8735-1133-6. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help) Kablammo 00:25, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Cemetery Infobox
[edit]@Nikkimaria: Any concerns if I re-add the Cemetery infobox? It felt appropriate to leave it, but curious to hear your take. Cheers, WidgetKid chat me 19:11, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- Could you elaborate on why you think it should be there? Nikkimaria (talk) 23:58, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- Because there's a section about a cemetery? I thought that's what that infobox is for. WidgetKid chat me 02:34, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
- It's typically for an article about a cemetery, which this is not. Do you think the cemetery is notable enough for its own article? Nikkimaria (talk) 04:26, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
- Ah, got it. Considering I just merged it from AfD, definitely not.
So, uh... nevermind! WidgetKid chat me 06:05, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
- Ah, got it. Considering I just merged it from AfD, definitely not.
- It's typically for an article about a cemetery, which this is not. Do you think the cemetery is notable enough for its own article? Nikkimaria (talk) 04:26, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

