Talk:Cal Clemens/GA1

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: BeanieFan11 (talk · contribs) 00:36, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 19:49, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

I'll review this. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 19:49, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Comments

• I made a change to how his birthdate discrepancy is written, just fyi
• By "two-way", are we talking about offense and defense? Could be made clearer and/or linked to two-way player
• year, but thought that he comma isn't needed
• and scoring another two himself "scored" instead of "scoring"
• of the National Football League just "NFL" is fine
• After one game, against the Boston Redskins,-->After a game against the Boston Redskins,
• Link "defense" to Arms industry.
• He battled cancer in his last years-->He was sick with cancer in his last years
• So with his obituary clearly stating his age at his time of death, I think we can just remove all mention of 1913 or 1914, right? Just erroneous information at this point.
• References:
  • All are reliable for what is being cited
  • All are consistently formatted
  • Spot checks: 2, 5, 9, 13, 20, 23

Nice work! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:33, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

• @Gonzo fan2007: I think I addressed everything. BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:54, 26 August 2025 (UTC)
  • Passed. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:45, 27 August 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.