Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Cactoideae

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Peter coxhead in topic Redirected

Redirected

[edit]

The article was unreferenced, and severely out of date. As an interim measure I have re-directed it to Taxonomy of the Cactaceae. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:39, 29 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Unfortunately the expansion of the article in January 2020 by Cs california was not explicitly sourced either, and is now also somewhat out-of-date. It's hard to keep up with the classification of Cactaceae! Peter coxhead (talk) 13:58, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
There's a review of the state of knowledge of cactus phylogenetic relationships in 2019 at doi:10.1093/jhered/esy064. As seems to be the case at present, clades are used in many cases rather than formal ranks. Peter coxhead (talk) 18:56, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
All of that is usually imported from the other wikipedias. If you got something more recent please do replace it--Cs california (talk) 03:38, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Cs california: ah, thanks for the response. When you import material from other wikipedias, please put {{Translated page}} on the talk page. It's necessary for copyright reasons, but also helps other wikipedia editors to understand where the material came from.
On the issue of an updated classification, at present I think there isn't a system supported by more recent molecular phylogenetic studies. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:42, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply