Talk:CWI-2
Add topicLatest comment: 8 years ago by Grin
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
There is quite a mess about CWI-1 and CWI-2, since most "modern" sources differ from most "ancient" sources. An anon have changed the position of capital o with double acute from "historical" CWI-2 position to "historical" CWI-1 position, possibly to match the "modern" sources, but yeah, that causes a mess. So, it seems originally and historically „Ő” has been on 167 in CWI-1 and 139 on CWI-2. --grin ✎ 11:40, 20 October 2017 (UTC)