Talk:CSS Wilmington

CSS Wilmington has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 26, 2020. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the CSS Wilmington article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States / American Civil War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	American Civil War task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

GA Review

Latest comment: 5 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:CSS Wilmington/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 01:31, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

I'll get to this over the next few days. Hog Farm _Bacon 01:31, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

I guess the 290 Foundation got it's 50-pound donation for the image
- You can read the discussion about this image's licensing at
  - I'll let the folks over at Commons decide what to do with this, then. Hog Farm _Bacon 15:56, 26 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
Indicate in the infobox that the length figure is length overall
Maybe use 9 feet six inches in the prose for the beam, not 9.5 feet, which is a construction I don't see often in that usage.
It's in a category about shipwrecks on the NRHP. NRHP listing is fairly significant (NRHP sites are generally consider to pass WP:GEOFEAT), so if this is true, the listing should be mentioned and briefly described in the prose, and mentioned in the lead, too.
- I think that's a mistake because Wilmington is in North Carolina, not Georgia.

Nice work. Gonna place this one on hold. Hog Farm _Bacon 18:02, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

I aim to please ;-) Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:28, 26 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

GA Review