Talk:CMD Group

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Untitled

Latest comment: 19 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article is a blatant advertisement for Reed Construction Data and should be removed immediately. I marked it with appropriately as DB-Spam and found the tag immediately removed. justinramedia 18:41, 29 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

I disagree.... they are a valuable news source

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

they are a valuable news source and reference for the Canadian industry and have been for almost a century. The content is presented appropriatley not refencing value proposition or advantage but rather sources for news, data etc. valuable construction content and should stay —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigtoe39 (talk • contribs) 17:39, 5 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Untitled

I disagree.... they are a valuable news source