Talk:CLP Group

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (65)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (75)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (77) • B-Class articles (367)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,408)

Image needed (357)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (6,689) • Stub-Class articles (7,132)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (179) • ...assess the un-Importance (2,193)

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in Hong Kong English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Revert

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I recently reverted a series of edits by the same person. I'm sorry! I applaud your being bold, but feel your additions need some improvement. I would be happy to talk with you, the editor whose work I recently reverted, and I hope I haven't made you unhappy! Your contributions are appreciated, so please don't be disheartened. I encourage you to respond and engage me in dialog! Fleetham (talk) 13:51, 26 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Revert