Talk:CHUD.com

This article was nominated for deletion on 16 April 2026. The result of the discussion was keep.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the CHUD.com article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Film

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm

Internet culture Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Citation failure

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Here are my notes on the sources for the article. At best, they included only a passing mention of the website in different context. Here are my notes for each reference.

https://www.newswire.com/bigfoot-entertainment-acquires/111753 Press release
https://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2012/03/11/from-moviegoers-and-critics-a-thousand-words-gets-zero/ paywall, unable locate archive
https://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/06/magazine/06jonze-t.html?pagewanted=all – Devin Faraci of Chud upset that WB wants to change Where the Wild Things Are script. Liked preview.
https://web.archive.org/web/20160307004841/http://articles.latimes.com/2008/apr/13/entertainment/ca-newline13/2
https://web.archive.org/web/20160307095242/http://tktk.gawker.com/film-critic-pleads-guilty-to-soliciting-sex-from-teen-o-1693319575 – Film critic Gabriel Toro used Chud’s message board – creepy posts before getting arrested for soliciting a minor.
http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/equilibrium-2002 – References a term Ebert thinks was made up by Nick Nuziata about gun fights in movies.
https://books.google.com/books?id=N-_6Vl1LHqgC&dq=Cinematic+Happenings+Under+Development+new+york+times&pg=PT278 – search result = 0 mention of Chud or Chud.com, or Nick Nunziata
https://books.google.com/books?id=1FEZE-Ml5N0C&dq=Cinematic+Happenings+Under+Development+new+york+times&pg=PA204 Chud.com listed in bibliography twice as a source.
https://legacy.aintitcool.com/node/44584 Devin Faraci of Chud reviews Clash of the Titans.
https://chud.com/25025/the-final-advocate-hello-i-must-be-going/ Devin Faraci leaves Chud.com – primary source.

I'm going to nominate for deletion - I couldn't find anything online to provide proof of notability beyond basic existence and their reviews. JesseL0vesT0ast (May the toast be with you.) (talk) 18:27, 16 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Citation failure