Talk:CFosSpeed

This article was nominated for deletion on 20 September 2021. The result of the discussion was keep.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Computing: Networking Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Networking task force.

No third party citations etc.

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Article could probably do with a bit of sorting out, as it's just an advertisement at the moment. Add citations, which need to be from third parties in order to satisfy [WP:NN] (e.g. reviews of the software on popular download sites), otherwise it might get flagged for deletion. Not a regular Wikipedia contributor, so not sure what else to suggest. Arfed (talk)

I was trying to give a concise account of what cFosSpeed is doing. I'm sorry for the advertisement-like style, I'm not used to write in Wikipedia. Maybe somebody can improve the style? As to the reviews, I have one here from a well-known German computer magazine (c't), but it's print. I guess, I can just quote from it? Both German and translated to English? Any ideas appreciated. Oliver91978 (talk) 16:10, 8 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Citation style template

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Resolved

Is the {{Citation style}} template reference now superfluous after I fixed the {{Cleanup-link rot}}? Oliver91978 (talk) 11:19, 17 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

No, it is not. Article citation style is definitely problematic. Use of {{Cite web}} and such is advised. Fleet Command (talk) 06:47, 18 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

I think this issue is entirely resolved. :) Fleet Command (talk) 07:07, 18 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

No third party citations etc.

Citation style template