Talk:Butterfly theorem
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by NuclearDuckie in topic First diagram is not to scale
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Proof
[edit]Does anyone actually visit Wikipedia for mathematical proofs?
Of course. :D —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.138.122.189 (talk) 18:38, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
"Please note"
[edit]The "please note" should be written above the proof, not below, because having the reader see it after he read the proof just makes it confusing.173.183.69.134 (talk) 19:44, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
- where is it? WorldDiagram837 (talk) 13:35, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
silly question
[edit]what does "The butterfly theorem is a classical result in Euclidean geometry..." mean? WorldDiagram837 (talk) 13:36, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
First diagram is not to scale
[edit]M is not actually the midpoint of PQ (nor XY) in this picture. A more accurate one might be helpful.
