Talk:Bundism

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bundism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110719123020/http://www.beth-tzedec.org/home.do?ch=content&cid=4688 to http://www.beth-tzedec.org/home.do?ch=content&cid=4688

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:03, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Upgrade to C-class

Looking at the page, it looks like it has decent structure, is written adequately, and is adequately-cited. It's missing a coherent explanation of the history of Bundism, which I would argue it needs before being further upgraded. Rosguill (talk) 02:57, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Lithuania

In Yiddish, Lithuania is not "Litah", but "Lite". The letter ע in ליטע (Lite) is pronunced [e]. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%98%D7%A2 --Manfariel (talk) 17:48, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Bund: "circle", or "union"?

In the Ideology section, under Marxism, we have this text:

"While the Jewish Labour Bund ["circle"]..."

But doesn't "Bund" mean, "union" or "league", rather than "circle"?

Best regards TheBaron0530 (talk) 18:33, 27 April 2020 (UTC)TheBaron0530

I've gone ahead and removed ["circle"]. While anecdotally a lot of bundist groups call themselves circles, I wouldn't translate "Bund" itself that way. Even if it were an accurate translation, it probably shouldn't go in that part of the article. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:57, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Bundism tense

I don't understand why this article is in the present tense. While I understand that some groups claim the legacy of the Bund, Bundism as a coherent political movement is dead. All of the sources that discuss the modern Bund discuss themselves as "New Bundists" and a new movement. Therefore, we should oblige them and also discuss the Bund as a past movement of the interwar period.

Encyclopedia Britannica lists it in the past tense. Abahs (talk) 01:22, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

We don't really describe ideologies in the past tense on wikipedia Bejakyo (talk) 22:32, 17 March 2026 (UTC)