Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:British Rail Class 421

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Dinoboyaz in topic Something Odd

Classification

[edit]

I would like to add a paragraph like this:

The original units were coded 4-CIG and 4-BIG. As with the earlier 4-COR, 4-CEP, 4-BUF and 4-BEP units, the "C" denoted "corridor", and the "B" denoted "buffet". The letters "IG" are the old LBSCR telegraphic code for Brighton. Under TOPS, 4-CIG became 421, and 4-BIG became 420; the latter was amended to 422 in 1984.

  • "British Railways Motive Power Survey". British Rail Locomotives and other motive power. London: Ian Allan. 1968. p. 15. ISBN 0 7110 0008 5.

--Redrose64 (talk) 19:47, 29 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Possible change to the title of this article

[edit]

This article is currently named in accordance the Wikipedia:WikiProject UK Railways naming conventions for British rolling stock allocated a TOPS number. A proposal to change this convention and/or its scope is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways#Naming convention, where your comments would be welcome.

'Car length'

[edit]

In the sidebar, the dimension 'Car length' is given, but the value evidently relates to an entire 4-car unit. Someone who has a reference for actual car-length is invited to enter both it and the correct value -- or failing this, to change the parameter to 'Unit length'. 165.120.98.3 (talk) 18:43, 7 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Something Odd

[edit]

According to you, the Class 421/3s only went up to 1753. However, I just found a photo that seems to suggest otherwise.

The link to it is here: http://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-network-south-east-train-brighton-railway-station-1991-sussex-en-1333062.html?pv=1&stamp=2&imageid=AE3A6EC9-1651-4F7D-B772-0B92DC6B8915&p=3993&n=41&orientation=0&pn=1&searchtype=0&IsFromSearch=1&srch=foo%3dbar%26st%3d0%26sortby%3d2%26qt%3drailway%2520station%2520brighton%2520sussex%26qt_raw%3drailway%2520station%2520brighton%2520sussex%26qn%3d%26lic%3d3%26mr%3d0%26pr%3d0%26aoa%3d1%26creative%3d%26videos%3d%26nu%3d%26ccc%3d%26bespoke%3d%26apalib%3d%26ag%3d0%26hc%3d0%26et%3d0x000000000000000000000%26vp%3d0%26loc%3d0%26ot%3d0%26imgt%3d0%26dtfr%3d%26dtto%3d%26size%3d0xFF%26blackwhite%3d%26cutout%3d%26archive%3d1%26name%3d%26groupid%3d%26pseudoid%3d%26userid%3d%26id%3d%26a%3d%26xstx%3d0%26cbstore%3d0%26lightbox%3d%26resultview%3dsortbyPopular%26gname%3d%26gtype%3d%26apalic%3d%26tbar%3d1%26pc%3d%26simid%3d%26cap%3d1%26customgeoip%3d%26vd%3d0%26cid%3d%26pe%3d%26saveQry%3d%26editorial%3d1%26t%3d0%26edoptin%3d

I apologize for the length. But anyway, if the 421/3s only wine up to 1753, why does the one in that photo have the number of 1754? Dinoboyaz (talk) 23:09, 15 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

I refuse to click that link - it has a massive query string, and I don't trust it. Who knows what it will do? --Redrose64 (talk) 23:23, 15 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
Don't worry:'nothing bad will happen. I know because I've been there myself. Dinoboyaz (talk) 23:55, 15 June 2016 (UTC)Reply