Talk:Brandtocetus
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Dodger67 in topic Comments
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comments
[edit]This is a valid, notable subject, albeit a stub, and while it is a little too technical for a general encyclopedia (jargon should be clearly defined and/or linked), and needs an appropriate {{Taxobox}}, I see no reason it shouldn't be an article, although like most stubs it could always use improvement. --Animalparty! (talk) 23:04, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- Agreed. Stubs have great value when they lead to a reliable source. I have no issues with the tone. Raggz (talk) 19:10, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- I've just accepted this article at AFC, I added a taxobox adapted from a related genus. The article probably needs some tweaking by subject specialists. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:58, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/28 September 2015
- Accepted AfC submissions
- WikiProject Cetaceans articles
- Stub-Class mammal articles
- Low-importance mammal articles
- WikiProject Mammals articles
- Stub-Class Palaeontology articles
- Low-importance Palaeontology articles
- Stub-Class Palaeontology articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Palaeontology articles
