Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology
The following reference(s) may be useful when improving this article in the future:
Latest comment: 1 month ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Someone who "works with the company" recently edited the article to remove a {{UDP}} tag from 2018. I reverted the edit because, as someone who works with the company, they themselves have a COI and probably shouldn't remove that template without discussion. I am interested in starting that discussion, though: Is there evidence that the article was created in exchange for undisclosed payments, has the issue been addressed, and should this tag remain? 〜Askarion✉00:59, 27 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Two years later, I'm going to remove the UDP. If strong evidence exists that the article was created in exchange for payment, we can put it back, but until that's provided consider: (a) the citations to The Guardian, Wired, etc. (from late-2017 and early-2018), which were there in the first draft of this article, point to the fact the company really was notable enough when the article was created (January 2018); and (b) given the article calls the company a "writer's society of artists and developers" (???), wouldn't it anyway be more likely that someone with a COI (someone associated with Botnik Studios) created the article than someone they actually paid money to (in which case you'd use WP:COI)? This isn't a well-written article, and it sounds like they could have easily got their heads around using the Source Editor if that's what they wanted to do. Prmkff (talk) 18:24, 7 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
You're right that the article isn't super well-written, but I guess that by itself doesn't warrant a tag. I'll have to research more sources for this page when I can, because a lot of the ones used are kind of low quality and/or cited incorrectly. 〜Askarion✉00:19, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
