Talk:Bonapartiste
Add topic | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | The content of the Bonapartiste page was merged into Bonapartism on 23 March 2019, and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article, please see its history. |
No Bees?
[edit]A bee can be drawn a thousand ways. It would be nice to see a couple of bees as historically depicted as symbols of Bonapartism. Unfortunately, there ain't no bees in this article, nor are there any in Napoleon I (not even in Bokassa as hinted here). Bees, please, anyone? --82.131.111.199 (talk) 20:43, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Requested move 17 September 2017
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: merge to Bonapartism. While not originally posed as the question, there is a good amount of support for this action. Primefac (talk) 17:38, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Bonapartiste → Bonapartiste movement – Per WP:NOUN. Bonapartiste is an adjective, and as an adjective it can be used on almost anything. A Bonapartiste person, a Bonapartiste party, a Bonapartiste general. This article is clearly about the political movement. Appah Rao (talk) 00:45, 17 September 2017 (UTC)--Relisting. Primefac (talk) 12:59, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support move to Bonapartist, per Use English, other reliable sources (https://www.britannica.com/topic/Bonapartist) and common sense. Our article on the man is called Napoleon (the English spelling), not Napoléon (the French spelling), so this should follow the same convention. Academicoffee71 (talk) 02:13, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
- This is a sock of a blocked user, see SPI. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:41, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
- As regards the move. We have an article on Bonapartism so what exactly is this article about? In ictu oculi (talk) 18:41, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
- Merge with Bonapartism per IIO — Amakuru (talk) 14:46, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support a merge for the reasons argued above. This is redundant.--Cúchullain t/c 17:36, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Merge completed