Talk:Boa vs. Python
Add topicLatest comment: 20 years ago by DoctorWho42 in topic Good Article nomination has failed
 | Boa vs. Python was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| Current status: Former good article nominee | |||||||||||||
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Boa vs. Python
[edit]Shouldn't this article be entitled: "Boa vs. Python" with an emphasis on the period? (since it is called that upon its corresponding imdb page and what-not) DrWho42 03:20, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Note to GA reviewers
[edit]I realize I am probably jumping the gun with this nominee, but I feel its a great way to get proper feedback. TruthCrusader 08:44, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Good Article nomination has failed
[edit]The Good article nomination for Boa vs. Python has failed, for the following reason:
- There is only limited content besides the plot summary and that content is not well organized. The Good Article criteria does not include the featured article criterion "t exemplifies our very best work" so there is not much I can say beyond that. Still, a very, very marginal topic (not that there's anything wrong with that) to nominate for GA. Pascal.Tesson 22:15, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Extra note this article was nominated for GA status. Please see this edit.
- Oh, it was my carelessness really... I misread the tag and thought it meant that it used to be a Good article but not anymore. Sorry for my confusion. DrWho42 23:14, 26 July 2006 (UTC)