Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Blue lace agate

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 months ago by GoldRomean in topic GA review
Good articleBlue lace agate has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 3, 2026Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 18, 2025.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that most blue lace agate (example pictured) was sourced from a single mine in Namibia until 2017?

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. You can locate your hook here. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by HurricaneZeta (talk) 00:59, 13 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Blue lace agate slab from Namibia
Blue lace agate slab from Namibia
  • Source: : p. 3 "For several decades small mines in southern Namibia have produced an attractive banded agate, mostly marketed as lapidary material. The major source has been a mine on Ysterputs (or sometimes spelled Ysterputz) farm, producing blue lace agate." p. 11 "Since 2017 the mine has been dormant and currently its future is unknown."

: "For many years, virtually all Blue Lace Agate came from Farm 254, Ysterputs, Karasburg West, southern Namibia . . . Since 2017, no Blue Lace Agate has been excavated from the deposit on Farm 254, and visitor access is forbidden."

: "The Blue Lace Agate mine exploited a hydrothermal vein deposit at Ysterputs in southern Namibia until 2017."
    • ALT1: ... that until 2017, most blue lace agate (pictured) was sourced from a single mine in Namibia? Source: same as above
    • ALT2: ... that most blue lace agate (pictured) originates from a single, now-defunct mine in Namibia? Source: same as above
    • Reviewed:
Converted from a redirect by I2Overcome (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

I2Overcome talk 06:39, 13 November 2025 (UTC).Reply

  • Review as follows: Hook is very interesting and catchy, is sourced and verified within the article. Article is certainly long enough and clearly presentable, with a proper infobox and illustrative images, as well as well-sourced. Content is neutral and copyvio-free. Image is free and is used within the infobox of the article. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 02:56, 14 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

GA review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Blue lace agate/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: I2Overcome (talk · contribs) 07:15, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: GoldRomean (talk · contribs) 02:23, 12 February 2026 (UTC)Reply


I'll take this :). Comments to come, within the next few days. GoldRomean (talk) 02:23, 12 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Prose review

[edit]

I am human, I may make mistakes, and pushback to any suggestions are okay and encouraged. I might make some copyedits as I go; feel free to revert and/or discuss here if there are any issues.

That's all for now! Might make a 2nd pass later. GoldRomean (talk) 03:33, 12 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your changes! All look good. Additional minor stuff:

  • the first external link is already cited as a source, maybe remove
  • link Brittleness in infobox? maybe Uniaxial too... but I don't know if reading Index ellipsoid is going to make an average reader more or less confused ;)

GoldRomean (talk) 19:24, 15 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Source review

[edit]
  • [4d] - by my reading of the source, it is saying that it is true that there are additional occurrences in South Africa, and it is possible that there are other occurrences elsewhere, but those locations have not been exploited (and thus, not as thoroughly covered)? optionally, might be a better link than to a forum post; also, providing individual page numbers here might be helpful.
    • Changed to The geological formations at Ysterputs are not unique to this one location. Similar chalcedony deposits can be found on nearby farms, and it is possible that there are other occurrences of blue lace agate in Namibia or neighboring South Africa that remain unexploited. The current website is where the newsletter was first published online, I think. I2Overcome talk 08:46, 12 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
  • [4h][6j] not egregious, but hints of WP:CLOP here. compare source (left) to article:
The blue colour of chalcedony is reportedly ascribed to Rayleigh scattering due to cavities, mineral inclusions, or sub-micron-sized spheroids thought to be amorphous silica. Transparent and translucent layers of chalcedony may fluoresce bright green under short-wave ultraviolet light.
+
The color of blue lace agate is believed to be due to Rayleigh scattering of light by tiny cavities, inclusions, or sub-microscopic particles of amorphous silica within the agate. In some specimens from Ysterputs, a fraction of the chalcedony bands appear fluorescent green under short-wave ultraviolet light due to trace amounts of uranyl ions.
  • and from [4a][4b]:
For several decades small mines in southern Namibia have produced an attractive banded agate [...] The major source has been a mine on Ysterputs (or sometimes spelled Ysterputz) farm, producing blue lace agate. It was promoted widely by the late George Swanson who owned the mine.
+
The primary source of blue lace agate for several decades was the privately-owned Ysterputs Mine (also spelled Ysterputz) on Ysterputs Farm 254 in Karasburg West, ǁKaras Region, Namibia. The mine was owned by the late George Swanson [...]
  • from [6p]:
The colour banding and thickness of individual layers is symmetrical on either side of a central plane
+
The color and thickness of the agate banding tends to be symmetrical on both sides of the fissure walls around a central plane
  • from [6i]:
Ysterputs is also the source of cubic chalcedony pseudomorphs, originally thought to be after fluorite, but probably after melanophlogite.
+
While previously thought to be pseudomorphs after fluorite, they are likely pseudomorphs after melanophlogite.
  • and [6e]:
Much of the chalcedony constituting the agate is the length-slow variety ‘quartzine’, indicatingdeposition in a saline environment
+
the majority of the chalcedony in blue lace agate is the length-slow variety, quartzine; this suggests that it formed in fluids with a high salinity
    • Do you have any specific suggestions on how I could rephrase these? I’m not sure how else I could express the same information accurately, and I don’t think the paraphrasing is really close except for the technical language. I2Overcome talk 08:46, 12 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
      Thanks for the speedy responses! hmm—the article currently primarily relies on two main sources, and I do think having more would help with this. Apropos of nothing, I really like WP:FIXCLOSEPARA and WP:MINE. The sentence structures could be more varied, and I feel like some words could still be swapped out, though I agree that it is not egregious and there's a lot of WP:LIMITED. A try at a clunky (and not necessarily ideal) rewrite: "Until its closure in 2017, one of the primary sources of blue lace agate was Ysterputs Farm 254 of the Ysterputs mine in Karasburg West, ǁKaras Region, Namibia." I'll leave more specific comments, later. GoldRomean (talk) 01:25, 13 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
  • [5] - is this a reliable source? looks like the blog of a mineral store.
  • [2] - is this (gemdat.org) reliable? from its website: "Gemdat.org relies on user contributions to improve the quality of our database."
  • (optional) the Pabian agate book is available at IA, maybe link?

Reading through that journal article, will come back with more source review. Feel free to ping if no updates by the 16th :). GoldRomean (talk) 18:18, 13 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Source review, part 2

[edit]

Other notes

[edit]
  • not sure what the general form is, but is it necessary to include locations for the image captions? They are all either from Ysterputs, probably from Ysterputs, or unknown (but presumably most likely from Ysterputs, as Ysterputs is the primary source?)
    • Removed from all except the one that is from Malawi. Some are definitely from Ysterputs (based on collection date, quality, and/or being labeled as from Namibia), others are probably from Ysterputs but could be from Malawi, Zambia, etc. I2Overcome talk 21:35, 15 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
  • an increased gallery size might be nice
  • I do think File:Blue lace agate lapidary slab.png shows that "pale blue" quite nicely and would work well as the infobox picture, but that's just a suggestion and I'm absolutely not going to quibble over it :).

Copyright checks out and suggestions above mostly optional for GAC; so that's all for criterion 6. GoldRomean (talk) 18:18, 13 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Not a lot of sourcing out there, but what is available is used. Neutral, stable, image/prose/source reviews above. Thank you for this interesting and well-written articles; just a couple things left here that I've noted :). In the meantime, I'm going to ask for a 2O: some quick thoughts from a third person on the paraphrasing problem/non-problem noted in the diffs above would be much appreciated. GoldRomean (talk) 19:34, 15 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Okay, revisiting this. I was leaning there before, and am even more there now (having had several weeks to think about it): if this is WP:CLOP, it's borderline at best—but I do think the paraphrasing is fine, and likely WP:LIMITED either way. Based on this (and the review above), I think this meets the GA criteria :). The 2O's been open for over a month (and seeing as the oldest one is from last year (!)) I'd rather not keep this waiting further. Passing, with sincere thanks for your patience and sincere apologies that this has been on hold for so long. GoldRomean (talk) 22:27, 3 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.