Talk:Blow lugworm
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | Text or other creative content from this version of Blow lugworm was copied or moved into Arenicola with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Suggest to import from the French page
[edit]The French language page for Arenicola marina is much more extensive and should probably be used as input. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-98729-1 (talk) 15:05, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
Wikified
[edit]Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! JubalHarshaw 20:18, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Yay for flying saucers!
[edit]Can anybody identify the stereotypical UFO/flying saucer.like object in the upper right hand corner of the picture on this page? Download image in highest resolution and zoom for better effect. It looks rather peculiar.I don't own any image enhancement software, but it would be awesome if someone that had could take a look. 87.56.199.161 22:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC) (User account Bobber0001, soo lazy to log on :) )
I am still curious about the object in the upper-right corner. I dropped a few lines at the discussion page of the image, I hope someone sees this or that. Bobber0001 (talk) 09:51, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi - I took the picture (the original one with all the worm casts). That was a seagull, sorry to disappoint! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.32.68.19 (talk) 00:47, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Davison (1891) has a lot of info which can be added to this page about sediment disturbances. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.195.124.145 (talk) 23:37, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
Hermaphrodite
[edit]Arenicola is not hermaphroditic as the lead says. I haven't been able to read the reference: you have to pay; but I doubt it states that, and another references (and THIS article) say the contrary. It is a species with males (with testes only) and females (with ovaries only), which is usual in polychaetes. I will delete that sentence in a few days. Also, the information about reproduction should be checked (masses of eggs, larvae developement...).--Miguelferig (talk) 20:24, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- "Hermaphroditic" sentence deleted.--Miguelferig (talk) 12:51, 5 March 2014 (UTC)