Talk:Bitmovin
Add topicLatest comment: 9 years ago by Ian.thomson in topic Assessment of article's sources: completely unacceptable
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Assessment of article's sources: completely unacceptable
[edit]I've reviewed this article's sources. What I've found:
- This is a personal site, fails WP:RS.
- This is a product page and so does not establish notability.
- This is a category for articles, not a specific article. Furthermore, it's a blog that's affiliated with the company.
- This does mention indeed mention them, but is not in-depth coverage.
- This doesn't even mention Bitmovin.
- The following sources are affiliated and so do not establish notability: , , ,
- The following sources appear to be press releases and so do not establish notability: , , ,
- The following are lists or directories and do not estalish notability any more than the phonebook does: , ,
- The following sources do not appear to exist, and given the "quality" of the other sources, I'm not inclined to believe that they're worth digging up on Internet Archive: , , ,
None of the sources support notability. Ian.thomson (talk) 09:42, 19 December 2016 (UTC)