Talk:Bill Gates
Add topic| Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bill Gates article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives (index): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. The entire article relates to the following contentious topics:
|
1. Can I write a message to Bill Gates here? (No.)
No. That is not the purpose of this page. Your message will be ignored and removed. 2. Should the post-nominal "KBE" appear after Gates's name in the introduction? (No.)
No. According to the Manual of Style, post-nominals should be omitted unless the article subject is closely associated with the issuing country. Gates's honorary knighthood is mentioned along with honors from several other countries in the "Recognition" section. 3. Is the article too favorable toward Gates? (Be more specific.)
This article is about Bill Gates as a person, not Microsoft as a company. Criticism of Microsoft has a separate article, as does the Gates Foundation. If you believe the article is too favorable to Gates as a person, please be specific about what the article says or does not say. Critiques must come from reliable sources and should not be founded on speculation. |
| This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| Bill Gates has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
| Other talk page banners | |||
| |||
| The following reference(s) may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
POV
[edit]A heading entitled "controversies" is inherently POV and also an issue of WP:UNDUE. These topics should be incorporated into the rest of the article. Iggy pop goes the weasel (talk) 19:26, 23 June 2025 (UTC), Wiki link added by PerLundberg (talk) 19:25, 11 July 2025 (UTC).
- Seconded. Even outside of that section, a lot of this article seems critical in nature, particularly in the "Political positions" section. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 17:47, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
- Was reading the controversies section - Maybe we can merge #Antitrust litigations and treatments towards coworkers part into the Microsoft section?
- For Epstein stuff I have no idea. I don't know what section should it belong to even if we were only going to mention it in a passing sentence. Personal life? Seems odd. Political positions...? This section itself is POV...
- Maybe we should create a section named "Outside Microsoft" or something like that. 海盐沙冰 (talk) 09:12, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
- I've moved everything in the controversies section into more appropriate locations. The question now is whether those sections need paring back, or whether they are appropriate. If/when we are content that the coverage is appropriate, the POV tag can go. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:53, 23 September 2025 (UTC)
- "A heading entitled "controversies" is inherently POV"
- Not at all. It's quite possible to be completely neutral and recognize controversies.
- Same for "Criticisms". Selbstporträt (talk) 01:30, 9 February 2026 (UTC)
- Agree. Neutrality becomes an issue only when one favors or skews one side of any controversy. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 17:54, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 1 May 2026
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
include in Covid section:
Dutch Court Orders Bill Gates to Stand Trial Over COVID-19 Vaccine Allegations
https://londondaily.com/rtrmnp-dutch-court-orders-bill-gates-to-stand-trial-over-covid-19-vaccine-allegations ~2026-20349-92 (talk) 22:28, 1 May 2026 (UTC)
Not done, that's just a headline. There's no context or apparent significance to it. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 22:57, 1 May 2026 (UTC)
- It is not "just a headline." There is a report below the headline and there was a court ruling. The substance of the ruling is that Gates was named as part of a defendant group in a vaccine safety lawsuit. His lawyers argued that he is a US resident and therefore outside Dutch court jurisdiction, but the Dutch court concluded that, under the circumstances, this is insufficient for dismissal before trial. ~2026-27607-47 (talk) 01:46, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
- Being a defendant id very different from being found guilty. 03:37, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
- No one here has said that he was found guilty. ~2026-27607-47 (talk) 20:24, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
- Then we don't mention it. Acroterion (talk) 22:22, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
Good Article reassessment discussion
[edit]The article should be reassessed and removed from Good Article status.
It has a neutrality concern that remains unresolved for a long time, which fails the criteria requirements. Since this issue has persisted without resolution, the article no longer satisfies the standards expected of a Good Article. - The9Man Talk 10:18, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
- What neutrality concern might that be? ~2026-27607-47 (talk) 01:24, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
Add public domain photo from 1980s
[edit]Found a high quality public domain color photo of Bill Gates from the 1980s via a Tandy magazine ad and uploaded it to Commons (File:Bill Gates with Tandy 2000 running Windows 1.0 (1984).jpg). Might be worth adding to the article! Suspiciouscelery (talk) 01:44, 19 May 2026 (UTC)
Bill Gates and Epstein Connection
[edit]Why the topic on Epstein Connection is so small? It also does not include some other notable facts and images that could provide more background on this incident. I am looking for making edits if no one is gonna do it. Morris (talk with this worm) 02:22, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
- It is not small, and it has an image. What do you believe is missing? ~2026-27607-47 (talk) 00:21, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
July is misspelled as jully
[edit]this is within the first paragraph when talking about as of now. ~2026-40261-05 (talk) 00:21, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- Fixed. Thanks for the heads-up. HiLo48 (talk) 02:06, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- Wikipedia good articles
- Engineering and technology good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- Biography articles of living people
- GA-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in People
- GA-Class vital articles in People
- GA-Class biography articles
- GA-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Top-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- GA-Class Washington articles
- Mid-importance Washington articles
- WikiProject Washington articles
- Washington articles with to-do lists
- GA-Class Seattle articles
- Low-importance Seattle articles
- WikiProject Seattle articles
- Seattle articles with to-do lists
- WikiProject United States articles
- GA-Class Computing articles
- Top-importance Computing articles
- GA-Class software articles
- Top-importance software articles
- GA-Class software articles of Top-importance
- All Software articles
- All Computing articles
- GA-Class WikiProject Business articles
- High-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- GA-Class sanitation articles
- Mid-importance sanitation articles
- WikiProject Sanitation articles
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report



