Talk:Bhat
Add topicYou are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If admin}}
You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page: .ECR-edit-request-warning {
display: none;
}
Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request This article is related to caste-related topics in South Asia, which is subject to the extended-confirmed restriction. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.) |
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. The entire article relates to the following contentious topics:
The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
| This article was nominated for deletion on 24 December 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
| This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review prior discussions if you are considering renomination.
Discussions
|
| This set index article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Are there more
[edit]@Anupam:, I was on the verge of removing this addition, but then digging a little I found this, so not only the Hoysala Brahmins, there are many from other states including Gujarat, West Bengal, Odisha, Andhra Pradesh, etc bearing the surname. Please have a look. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:39, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Requested move 28 May 2026
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Unopposed move and WP:MISPLACED. (closed by non-admin page mover) ⹃Maltazarian ᚾparleyinvestigateᛅ 21:16, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
Bhatt (last name) → Bhatt – Since the titles “Bhatt” and “Bhatt (surname)” already involve existing redirects and some page history, I request that this page be moved to “Bhatt” as the primary title for the surname article. Kashmiri Pandit (talk) 18:53, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
- Support. Only article with this title and primary topic in any case. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:59, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Blanket revert appeal
[edit]Since May 18, 2026, @Logical Editor Kakji had made edits to the Bhatt article. Those edits were on a distinct topic, unrelated to the topic of other articles, for which the account was blocked. The edits were correct and had been widely accepted, and the page was also moved in the meantime, with consensus. The sudden blanket revert by @Cena332 disrupts the article's development and removes a significant amount of content that was added later. Also it doesn't align to the rename of the page. XYZWORLDS (talk) 06:40, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
I find it curious that your account has been made right now. All the edits I reverted on Bhatt had to do with Logical Editor Kakji revisions. Any edits made inbetween by other editors was just fixing his edits he made. You say 'those edits were on a distance topic' for which he was banned, that is not true the reason he was banned was that he was abusing multiple accounts. I'll leave it to administrators determination but something is very suspicious here. Why is ~2026-37463-46 & @XYZWORLDS who both have made their accounts today commenting on me reverting edits of Sock account that has been blocked. Cena332 (talk) 07:13, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
Update XYZWORLDS was as a sock of Logical Editor Kakji. Cena332 (talk) 17:15, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
In my estimation Arjayay, all we would have to do is just change the articles name back to Bhat? before Logical Editor Kakji (then Kashmiri Pandit) moved the page himself in May, what your opinion Cena332 (talk) 17:23, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Speedy close as Move back to revert un-discussed move by socking editor which was against prior consensus, as this article falls under WP:CTOP Mfield (Oi!) 18:40, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
Requested move 3 July 2026
[edit]Bhatt → Bhat – After discussion with Arjayay on his talk page, he recommended i open a request move. Basically a sock had been editing this page, I removed all his revisions, but the title that he renamed himself on May 28 is still the same. In order for the page to go back to as it was, we would need to rename article back to Bhat. Cena332 (talk) 06:11, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support. The move made on 28 May 2026 (Bhat > Bhatt (last name)) was totally undiscussed, and was not supported by any evidence, nor by the requested move of 20 March 2021 (see above).
The move made at 21:17, 4 June 2026 (Bhatt (last name) > Bhatt) was made simply because there was no need for a disambiguating term, not an endorsement of the previous move. To avoid possible confusion, User:Kashmiri Pandit, as referred to in the 28 May move, was the user name of User:Logical Editor Kakji before their account was renamed. - Arjayay (talk) 09:53, 3 July 2026 (UTC) - Support – The current title was changed without discussion. Moving it back to the previous title restores the stable version. Accesscrawl (talk) 13:48, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
*Oppose – The term Bhat is transliterated as भट while the term Bhatt is transliterated as भट्ट, which is the original Sanskrit term. It's a common thought that both Bhat and Bhatt are the shortened forms of Bhatta but actually Bhatta is essentially its pronunciation form "Bhaṭṭa". The term Bhat is pronounced in the same way in the modern world but its exact pronunciation is Bhāṭ, which is not the original pronunciation of the surname. Also, the surname Bhatt is more commonly used than Bhat. ~2026-32628-41 (talk) 14:25, 3 July 2026 (UTC) Striking comment by blocked sockpuppet TA. Mfield (Oi!) 17:13, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
- List-Class Anthroponymy articles
- NA-importance Anthroponymy pages
- List-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- List-Class India articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject India articles
- List-Class Pakistan articles
- Low-importance Pakistan articles
- WikiProject Pakistan articles
- List-Class Nepal articles
- Low-importance Nepal articles
- WikiProject Nepal articles
