Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Before Adam

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 years ago by 90.202.209.109 in topic Australopithecine?

Before Adam is a novel

[edit]

James Gunn in Road to Science Fiction: Vol. 2 refers to Before Adam as a novel and gives a 1906 publication date. I don't know if he is just referring to the work as a novel in a conceptual sense, or if the work was in fact published as a stand-alone book. It does seem to be written like a novel (though I've only glanced at it). The next to last paragraph of the final chapter: "There is one other thing of which I must speak before I close." If it's not a novel, then it should at least be referred to as a grouping of short stories, or something like that. NinetyNineFennelSeeds (talk) 21:06, 12 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Australopithecine?

[edit]

Is it appropriate to use this specific term when the novel was published some 2 decades before the first such fossils were discovered and the term coined (I believe in 1925)? If such a comparison has been made in the critical literature, it should be referenced: otherwise, it smacks of WP:Synthesis, applying an unsupported interpretation to something London (who does not use the word in the novel) could not have explicitly known about, much like speculating whether Edgar Rice Burroughs' language-using apes who raised Tarzan were Homo naledi. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 94.12.78.91 (talk) 17:33, 17 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

To avoid future confusion: as part of a discussion of this point on the Science Ref Desk, User:Henry Flower|Flower removed the term, with no subsequent dissent. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 90.202.209.109 (talk) 13:57, 18 July 2017 (UTC)Reply