Talk:Beautiful Fighting Girl

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Beautiful Fighting Girl/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 11:51, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

Reviewer: Z. Patterson (talk · contribs) 23:56, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

I will be reviewing the article. Z. Patterson (talk) 23:56, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

The nominator is the top author according to XTools. There appear to be no copyright violations or plagiarism. Images appear to be licensed appropriately, and the non-free image has a solid non-free use rationale. Images are relevant to the subject of the article. Subject is notable, based on what I find in Google, Google Books, Google Scholar, Internet Archive Scholar, JSTOR, Gale, ProQuest, Project MUSE, Wiley Online Library, and Oxford Academic. I formatted the ISBNs. The article appears to be broad, neutral, and stable despite its recency. The prose appears to be strong. A more detailed review may be forthcoming, but I should be able to fix any issues I come across myself. Z. Patterson (talk) 00:35, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

@Generalissima: The article also appears to have no original research. Any corrections that were needed were easy, so I was WP:BOLD and fixed them myself. I am passing this as a good article. Z. Patterson (talk) 12:39, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that a 2001 academic text psychoanalyzed the sexuality of otaku?

• Source: Have you ever wanted to psychoanalyze an otaku? If so, you are not alone, for psychiatrist Saito Tamaki has done just that in Beautiful Fighting Girl, drawing upon the psychoanalytic tradition of Jacques Lacan to explore the otaku fascination with the beautiful fighting girl. Brienza, Casey (2013). "Review of Beautiful Fighting Girl". Journal of Graphic Novels and Comics: 185–186. doi:10.1080/21504857.2011.629667.

• • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Debut Wingdings album

Created by Generalissima (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 155 past nominations.

Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 03:17, 22 July 2026 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: All looks good. Turned into GA on 19 July, submitted to DYK three days later. Long enough. No copyright issues, Earwig's Copyvio Detector gives 18%, flagging names and quotes. Hook mentioned and sourced. I see no problems. A.Cython(talk) 01:07, 23 July 2026 (UTC)