Talk:Battle of Northam

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 5 February 2021 by reviewer Eternal Shadow (talk · contribs).

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: British / European / French / Medieval

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

Refimprove

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The existing references aren’t horrible, but the article says that several things are “unknown”, and the references seem geared to they layman. I just think that the article could be improved on this front if someone looked through scholar.google.com or an academic library/database. Elinruby (talk) 16:30, 12 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Refimprove