Talk:Barujibi

Bangladesh Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

India: West Bengal Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject West Bengal (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in March 2012.

You are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below

You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If admin}} You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page:

.ECR-edit-request-warning {
	display: none;
}

Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request

This article is related to caste-related topics in South Asia, which is subject to the extended-confirmed restriction.

You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.)

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. The entire article relates to the following contentious topics:

The region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups
Caste-related topics in South Asia, a subtopic of South Asia.

The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page, except for making constructive edit requests.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator.

Colonial census and Raj era sources

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments3 people in discussion

@CharlesWain, @Ekdalian, I can see this article was expanded recently using colonial census reports and Raj era sources. You have either put "better source needed" template or partially removed some contents; but are these enough in this case? Also pinging Doctrosa who added these for answers. Chanchaldm2 (talk) 10:39, 18 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

If you want you may remove those contents, or you can replace with modern sources. I didn't remove as I didn't find any extraordinary claims as such. CharlesWain (talk) 14:20, 19 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

I agree with CharlesWain! Chanchaldm2, you may remove the content mentioned, if you want to. Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 16:36, 19 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Colonial census and Raj era sources