Talk:Barnstokkr/GA1
Add topicLatest comment: 17 years ago by Bloodofox in topic GA Review
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA, and should have the full review up soon. Dana boomer (talk) 20:28, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Everything looks good, so I am passing this article to GA status. Another great article, very nice work! Dana boomer (talk) 20:35, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks again, glad you liked it! :bloodofox: (talk) 01:46, 18 October 2008 (UTC)